Originally posted at American Thinker.
Any woman willing to call late-term abortion “sacred ground” and make false accusations that the opposing political party voting for the Protect Life Act would leave pregnant women “dying on the floor” deserves an award named after someone as demonically-inspired as eugenicist Margaret Sanger, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is that woman.
Pelosi is scheduled to deliver remarks at the Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s “Stronger Together” Annual Gala in Washington DC Thursday. The PPFA gala is where abortion activists gather annually over fruit salad and popovers to celebrate the right to dispose of living human beings.
According to Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards, “in recognition of her leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement over the course of her career,” Nancy Pelosi will be given the Margaret Sanger Award, which Planned Parenthood considers its “highest honor.”
Cecile Richards, who defines baby-killing as healthcare, is the woman who, during a recent interview with Jorge Ramos on the Fusion TV Network, expressed the opinion that the question of when life begins is not relevant to the abortion debate.
What an honor this will be for Nancy to be recognized as the latest heroine of the abortion mill that slaughtered 327,166 human beings in 2012 alone, and whose annual recognition represents the ideals and values of Margaret Sanger, a self-proclaimed feminist who was ahead of her time as she attempted to contribute to humanity through fostering racial hatred and genocide.
A committed socialist, Margaret Sanger once said, “My own personal feelings drew me toward the individualist, anarchist philosophy…but it seemed necessary to approach the idea by way of Socialism.” Sanger said:
This is the great day of social planning. We have come to believe in planning the production and distribution of goods. We plan methods of governing cities, states, and the nation. We plan jobs, and leisure-time activities, and vacations. We plan almost everything, big and little, except families. It can scarcely do any harm and it may do a vast amount of good to engage in thoughtful, planning of our population, a population with a still larger percentage of happy families.
Sound familiar?
An active worker for the Socialist Party, Sanger believed “the more radical the ideas the more conservative you must be in your dress.” Think: community organizer Barack Obama, who, per Saul Alinsky, “dresses his crusades in vestments of morality,” and Nancy Pelosi, who lobbies for abortion rights and then receives communion at St. Vincent de Paul’s in San Francisco.
As a practicing Catholic, Nancy can step right up with pride and accept accolades in the form of an award with a woman’s name on it whose view of the Catholic Church’s teaching on contraception was that church doctrine “…enforces subjugation by turning [a] woman into a mere incubator.”
For Margaret Sanger, eugenics was an avenue to improve the human race by discouraging people with genetic defects or undesirable traits, blacks, immigrants and poor people, whom she called “human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning…human beings who never should have been born.”
Now wait just a minute! Does it matter that this year’s Margaret Sanger Award winner is all for granting amnesty to “human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning…human beings who never should have been born?”
Another irony is that Italian-American Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi, who believes deporting illegal immigrants is “just wrong,” had grandparents named Maria and Tommaso who immigrated to America from Italy. If Margaret Sanger had had her eugenic way with Maria Foppiani-Petronilla, Mrs. Pelosi wouldn’t be here, let alone receiving an award.
In February 1919 in The Birth Control Review, the prolific Sanger published an article entitled “Birth Control and Racial Betterment.” That means, besides Nancy Pelosi, there’s another politician who supports improving the human race through free birth control and an abortion clinic on every corner: our very own mixed-race President Barack Obama, who would probably also be amongst those of the black race Margaret Sanger deemed unfit to be born.
In 1934, Sanger wrote an article entitled “America Needs a Code for Babies: Plea for Equal Distribution of Births.” Mrs. Sanger’s ‘baby code’ said that people with “bad genes,” or dysgenic groups, should be given a choice between sterilization and segregation. Those who willingly chose sterilization would be rewarded for contributing to a superior race.
In Article 6, Sanger suggested issuing parenthood permits that would be valid for no more than one birth.
One birth! Paul Pelosi subjugated this year’s Margaret Sanger Award winner into agreeing to gestate five children in her incubator. Then poor Nancy passed through the “vale of death alone” and gave birth to five of Paul’s children without a single Margaret Sanger parenthood permission slip. For those five reasons alone, Nancy Pelosi should be disqualified from receiving any praise from Planned Parenthood.
Despite being lionized by socialist liberals, Margaret “every child a wanted child” Sanger’s legacy is one of murder, racism, revulsion for the handicapped, intrinsic disgust for the male gender, and a form of twisted radicalism that viewed God-ordained marriage and the miracle of life with contempt.
Sanger met her maker in 1966. At 82 years of age, history’s most famous female eugenicist went the way of the most famous male eugenicist, and all the innocent babies she lobbied to eliminate before her.
Yet the diabolical activities that she lived and died and ultimately had to answer for have continued to this day, to the extent that almost half a century later the likes of Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi view it as a compliment to receive a Planned Parenthood prize in memory of a so-called birth control pioneer.
Margaret Sanger’s pathetic life was committed to curing what she viewed as the “urgent problem” of how to “limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.” Nancy Pelosi accepting an award associated with the vile woman who inspired Planned Parenthood confirms, at least in this particular case, that mental deficiency really does impact society in a negative way.
Hi mates, good article and good arguments commented here, I am actually enjoying by these.
Hi there I actually is so thrilled I came across your website, I genuinely found you by blunder, while I was searching Yahoo for something more, Anyhow I am in this article now and would merely like to say many thanks for a tremendous write-up and an all rounded exciting weblog (I likewise love the theme/design), I actually don’t have time to be able to proceed through it all with the minute but My partner and i have saved it and in addition added in your FEED feeds, while I include time I will get back in read more, Remember to do carry on the great job.
I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you design this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz answer back as I’m looking to design my own blog and would like to know where u got this from. thank you
You’ve provided some really good points here. Well done!
While shopping for premium skincare brands such as La Mer, the assurance of authenticity is
paramount to the buying process. Although major marketplaces
including Amazon, eBay, and Walmart have faced complaints about the genuineness of La
Mer products, LMCHING stands out as a dependable
provider for customers in the UK and France. Setting itself apart from larger platforms, the company certifies that the entire product range features
original packaging, featuring every authenticity marker,
giving buyers peace of mind that they are getting the real deal.
One of the standout benefits of shopping with LMCHING is their commitment
to offering genuine La Mer products. User testimonials indicate that some customers on large
marketplaces have received La Mer items in boxes that raise concerns or were
missing safety markers. Unlike others, LMCHING has built its reputation for delivering according to La Mer’s quality benchmarks.
This assurance is appreciated by beauty lovers valuing genuine products and
premium care.
In addition to authenticity, this platform ensures reasonable prices, positioning
it as a desirable option to more mainstream platforms.
Even though premium items like La Mer come with luxury-level costs, LMCHING strives to balance affordability with product quality.
Shoppers in both regions are turning to this retailer for its reasonable pricing model,
which enables access to premium cosmetics
while maintaining authenticity.
A standout advantage that sets LMCHING apart is its fast order fulfillment.
Buyers across both regions appreciate prompt service, allowing deliveries in under three days.
This is a significant advantage for shoppers who value both convenience and speed for self-care essentials.
Unlike larger platforms, giant platforms typically experience delays, especially due to complex
logistics.
Offering a mix of swift service, genuine products, and competitive rates positions LMCHING as a
top choice for luxury skincare buyers. Now where counterfeits
are a major concern, the retailer’s emphasis on real goods makes them a
standout choice.
On top of that, their platform ensures individualized attention that few
others can replicate. With a specialization in luxury cosmetics,
they meet the tailored needs of their buyers.
This personalized care gives LMCHING an edge among the competition, offering buyers
a secure choice for their cosmetic routines.
There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I think you made certain nice points in features also.