Investing in Venezuela’s Future

Originally posted at American Thinker. blog

Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez, much like American President Barack Obama, believes in “sharing wealth.” As a means of satisfying “human needs … equally [and] without privilege,” Chávez adheres to “the fundamental goal of socialism.” If a person has what is considered excess, Hugo looks for creative ways to divide and redistribute the possessions of the one fairly among the many.

Hugo’s form of social impartiality assures the nation’s poor that the government is the provider of every earthly need. Venezuela’s government “subsidize[s] food to low-income families, redistribute[s] land and wealth, and pour[s] money from [a] booming oil industry into health and education programs.”

One area where Chávez’s pervasive redistributive efforts have failed is in the provision of shelter for Venezuela’s poor.  The Chávez government has built “fewer than 40,000 units a year – some say only 24,000 – in contrast to previous governments, which averaged 70,000.” Therefore, Venezuela is further along in the housing crisis than countries farther north.

Compounding the problem is the severe flooding that has devastated hillside slums, “displaced thousands of families [and] highlight[ed] the shortage of 2 million or so housing units.” As a result, people looking to the government to provide for every human necessity “have had to erect shacks on top of shacks on precarious slopes.”

What socialist leaders like Hugo Chávez never acknowledge is Marxism’s repeated failure to deliver on big promises. Rather than abandon a failed system, Hugo Chávez turns again to plunder Venezuela’s middle and upper classes with plans to dole out stolen money to people who didn’t earn it.

When it comes to addressing Venezuela’s housing shortage, Chávez chooses to remedy the problem by eliminating the unjust practice of owning a home with unused space. In a failing global economy, Hugo’s fair and equitable fix even has the potential to be implemented, if need be, in high-foreclosure American cities like Detroit and Las Vegas.

The plan includes recruiting the military to ensure the homeless can take up residence in a stranger’s private home, as well as justifying the seizure of property by accusing rich people of hoarding and “leaving idle” all the best land. Also included is a strong dose of class warfare, forced closure of golf courses, and a proposal suggesting that “thousands of poor families could be settled” on the greens of the Caracas Country Club.

Chávez commenced the property-sharing program by stepping up “rural expropriations [by] deploying 1,600 troops at 47 farms…claiming the farms were unproductive.” The Venezuelan government also eyed urban areas to populate with the homeless as a way to reinforce “fading support in the slums, once Chávista heartlands, which [more recently] have voted for opposition mayors and governors.”

In response, and with little prodding from the government, a “wave of squats” dressed in Chávez Socialist Party red tee-shirts “seized 20 spaces in a coordinated strike in the well-off Caracas municipality of Chacao.”

In fact, a five-star hotel in Chacao is presently hosting 60 displaced families. Two women living in the hotel said, “We’re supposed to use the service entrance and not go near the lobby, but we get treated well. Three meals a day, everything free.”  According to the poor residents of the five-star hotel, the experience of Chávez’s most recent effort to redistribute wealth can only be described as wandering in the “desert, and then…[getting to] an oasis.”

Apparently, Hugo has faith to believe aggressive socialist policies can “win the future” by merely forcing Venezuela’s diminishing middle and upper classes to “invest” in Chavez’s bid for re-election by mandating they relinquish personal property and wealth.

2,562 Comments

  1. Three March 1979: Chelsea débutant goalkeeper Petar Borota picks up a clear sheet against Liverpool, while Osvaldo Ardiles and David Mills rating their first targets for their clubs: the Argentine internationalist luggage a brace in Tottenham’s 2-zero win over Derby County whereas Mills contributes to West Bromwich Albion’s 3-1 win over Coventry City.

  2. Great site you have here but I was curious if you knew of any user discussion forums that cover the same topics discussed in this
    article? I’d really like to be a part of
    online community where I can get opinions from other experienced individuals that
    share the same interest. If you have any recommendations,
    please let me know. Thanks a lot!

  3. I must thank you for the efforts you’ve put in penning this site.
    I am hoping to see the same high-grade content by you later on as well.
    In truth, your creative writing abilities has motivated me to get
    my own, personal site now 😉

  4. I’m amazed, I must say. Rarely do I come across a blog
    that’s both educative and engaging, and without a doubt,
    you’ve hit the nail on the head. The issue is something not enough men and women are
    speaking intelligently about. Now i’m very happy that I came across this during my hunt
    for something regarding this.

  5. It’s appropriate time to make some plans for the future and it is time
    to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you some interesting things or tips.

    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.

    I desire to read more things about it!

  6. 終盤、岸田とケンカしたが、平野の一言でヨリを戻した。嘴平伊之助も乱入。善逸、伊之助がともに鬼を仕留め、炭治郎も元・錆兎と真菰の亡霊との稽古で成長を遂げた炭治郎は、2年後に命を賭けた最終関門である選別試験で彼らの仇である手鬼を倒し、「鬼殺隊」に入隊する。

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top